He said *a fowl*!

T-He He He He!

Lede[**] is pre-read of article.

P.S.* He said...she what? Ctrl F "incongruity"

*'n. P.R. (post-read) (O.W.)

[**] Editors note:(original saved in draft 3-2-13)
"Lede" replaces "Note", and to make a long G'Ribble short, my jest(or preemptive punchline) was Hume or Us? And to parse the pre-post-or-us, the asterisk was a play on my pre- & post- read of T-He article.  Original title: A Fowl[!]

SHOCK and AWE(UPDATE)

Martin Bashir on Aid to Pakistan [To the President:]

So before he is tempted to cut all forms of funding, I would like to remind him of the wise words that he wrote back in 2006 in his book "The Audacity of Hope." Speaking about the circumstances in which terrorism can flourish, he highlighted failed states and poverty as the two most important factors.

Not to raise any suspicions** but the mission has not been so clearly defined in original reports.

CIA Chief Leon Panetta, later Tuesday told NBC News, "The authorities(sic*) we have on Bin Laden are to kill him. And that was made clear. But it was also, as part of their rules of engagement, if he suddenly put up his hands and offered to be captured, then they would have the opportunity, obviously, to capture him. But that opportunity never developed."

But back to the issue of aid. See raise link.

Using stringent language, a statement by the Pakistani Foreign Office said, "Such an event shall not serve as a future precedent for any state, including the United States."

This is clearly a nuanced not "stringent language". But if,(and I mean A BIG IF) Osama bin Laden has been hiding in this compound for six years, it is difficult for the Bush administration to take much credit for the success of this mission, (let alone waterboarding). And while President Obama has been clear on the issues of failed states and poverty being part of the security equation, it is hard to expect Pakistan to be totally free of corruption or political and intelligence intrigue, let alone competence***. It is much easier to speculate and develop tin foil conspiracies that may actually be based on some evidence, and to use them to destabilize, than it is to change things at home let alone for another country. As the right seems to paint themselves into the corner of hypocrisy, the President has the responsibility of being the cherry picker and decider-in-chief. And in connecting the dots of the likes of the latest Right, (remember A BIG IF) then there must be some logic that the Bush administration must be further scrutinized for their part in a $1.4 trillion escapade of terror. How can we hold other countries responsible for competentencies when ours (and often rightly so) are so political?

* my (sic)inserted maybe "authorizations"?
** it is not the "fog of war" it is the fog of understanding and journalism
*** there is some irony in this linkage given prior asterisks
[Apologies for the nuance and dynamics of this threading, it is tricky to deal with the likes of some thinking, let alone journalism. And it was not my intent to necessarily minimize incitefulness or skirt a tin-foil issue or weave Teflon administrations.]

[While I may have great peripheral vision, I link the link weave last, but it was embedded in any above(3rd link).]
[Breaking news (which might be broken), apparently they will not release the photo of bin Laden, the argument is that there may be no pleasing some.]

[Further Embed Meant: Pakistan and speaking of timing. The death of A BIG IF?]
[Back to My TetraHeDron? Not Exactly!]
[Post Post In-put]
[Pre-Post er us in - put?]

Thursday, May 05, 2011
No Photos
"cathartic moment"
Now* to America's Future

*actually see not so Pre-Post er us reference to in-put(above). Also on Rumsfeld. On Stiglitz. Doing Justice?
[Important flip-flop or fair and balanced rearrangement regards the perspectives of Samuel P. Huntington and Francis Fukuyama. From Clash of Civilizations I may have cherry picked or perspectivized my analysis via tangential influences. While Francis Fukuyama has corrected his alignment from The New American Century, from renouncing the Bush administration to supporting and influencing the Obama Doctrine, it is not just ironic that the tag line for the issue of release of the bin Laden photos is, "It is not who we are" nor that the likes of the right see almost everything as a culture war. Or that both Bush and I were opti-mystic,(yeah right, he was) and why we now have hope.

"OFF A CLIFF"

Dumbest Proposal Ever.
by Joe Conasan The New York Observer

HUMPTY DUMPTY! COME ON DOWN!***

A quick glance at the headings put this together. But preemptively[*] I will say that a friend of mine has had a squabble with a builder over a fence or the height of it. There is a drop off on the other side which anyone would be concerned about kids or just anyone slipping or falling into. Well, I don't know about the height of any projects but as Obama has indicated "We are in this together". Maybe my analysis or faith has been too flip-floppy. But it is better to ride the fence down than to slip or fall off on either side. Riding a fence does not mean D-riding the project as irony would have it the Republicans seem to do, by having it both ways and expect things to not be on the fence and by not working on it. This metaphor may not work exactly, as government is not a business and both sides of the fence are not down hill. But maybe they are, just one is away from the fence (the project) the other is toward it. But my real point is that if you get pushed off the fence (the project) nothing will get done and we will all be slipping. But if the fence is the thing not the people, and it is at the top of a hill so to speak, getting pushed off will pop all our bubbles or maybe it is more like Humpty Dumpty

[UPDATE 3-16-09: "OFF A CLIFF"]
[3-16-09: The Fence? Is Obamanomics Conservative or Revolutionary? by Robert Reich, Salon]

[3-18-09 bold added with update].]

[Also (nfry) Obama wants G20 to act on stimulus, reform]

[*] Update 3-16-09: Preemptive in that I had not yet read the referenced "cliff" link below or the "Dumbest"** piece on the Republican obstructionism. And still not having read the "G20" but append it where appropriate in text, I think it is safe to say that when Buffet spoke of Obama, and Obama later spoke, Wall Street listened. Not that they said anything. Talk about clarity, I don't know if I should rock or dine.

** since have
*** 3-27-09 update heading inserted here and pre-post-or-us link inserted at Humpty Dumpty

[11-4-11 follow up move up link

Voodoo Economics Redux?

Or is it Tri-ducks, not in a row.
Not really meaning third times a charm, but that it ducks the question and begs the future. Calculations cannot be made based on terms of infinity, it should seem. The faux principle of gravity or trickle down or Laffer curve should not be calculable without understanding of the curve if not calculus.

[The reference to the Laffer curve is the assumptions that differ based on which side of the bell curve one is on when changes are made. It would seem that their might be a similar point if not additional principle or missing factor that could make any argument based on "generational accounting" irrelevant.]

[Tri-Ducks would be Re 3 Govs: Reagan, Bush and Sanford.*]

* this is not meant to be funny but I am simultaneously ahead of the curve as well as behind Think Progress in linking the pre-post or us.(meaning I found the link post post.)

[7-6-09: update ]

By Polar

wise crackers re:cycled?

Re:dimentionalism and polls*, beyond them and us. 
I will take the brunt of the crackers crack, and crumble the pun on the wise words of Simon or who says... what?

Post Bracket Eds(below): Somewhere there has been a leak of a congressional sense that more needs to done in Syria.  Are the wrest** leaning back as the west stands ground?  

*Not to trans\pose Ed and Aye. Formerly(ed. note) =columns.
(FP2)[on the tick tock ? (kn-0t)]
[Closing Bracket Eds?]
** con-volution of lean and means: Re. cheer leaders (stand up/stair down)

9-11-13 Pre-Post Or Us. (I/eye) The Byrd is the Word ! (the tick tock) or teddy?
Harmony and Irony? Duh Bares ? [!]
[The Last Word yesterday in regards to Polar Culture. My original intent was in regards to columns of cracks; mine and others, but also the polarities of the process that brings progress.  Not to mention a crack @ the cold war. Related anachronistic theory: Good Cop/Bad Cop?(Congress/Obama), (Russian Foreign Minister/Putin) or by/bye? Let alone Re:Cycle(today). (The Fog of War and Tactical Voices.) ]

FOOTNOTE PAGE ONE July 2013

7-9-13 *(b.s. ) "game+theory" and "game+metaphor" and "danger+field" M-bed under "not to pun"[scroll over both *&(b.s.) here] NOW TO THE INSERTS or the (b.s.) under "Is there?"/ "Who dat?"

7-10-13 Two Points [in Tow]or prose or just scroll over "Two Points [!]" Jared Bernstein comment with flat perspectivism. (Re-C-Physiks) i.e. Tax Reform level field theory.

7-11-13  NOW(link)TBa: followed by (b.s.) as follows-
Of
course = "TOW+GPS" The Be All and End All? (s.c. ) ,
the
economy = "global + buffet" June(2013)FPO,
ruins = "Runes" What are the Frackin' Odds... (s.c.)  ,
through ="garden" A common thread ( b.s. ) Con Text (b.s. )  ,
it =  "Voltaire" HAPPY FOURTH OF JULY! (s.c. ) ,
[!] = "bubble+metaphor"  I'm sorry? , Caging Godzillas (b.s.), Pre-Pan FRY.,
          It's Obama's    Turn ,  GPS Cross Rhodes , From GOP to NOP (s.c. ), Pre-post-or-us? (s.c. )
Note: (s.c.) indicates hyperlink directs elsewhere to provide actual link as well 

7-12-13 : (Scroll over each in context of exclamation [marks.]) Hope to Read!  Honest Lede or Ship[!]

7-14-13 Spoiler Alert A. The Anti-Angle./ "Powered By Intel"  B. Voodoo Revisited.(s.c. )/ Index 9-21-11 (s.c.)
7-15-13 the TMZ Too Much Zone ?

7-18-13  I. A. Unreasonable Proof of/or Reality., B. Apples and Oranges and Cherry Picking., II.The Senate didn’t go nuclear. But, actually, it kind of did.   III. Obama's Last Campaign:  White House plan to sell Obamacare 

7-23-13: Ctrl F "metaphor" - ! -
7-30-13: (b.s) Manning(sc), Ctrl F "jobs"(sc), \ ( b.s. )"M", (b.s.)"-b-e-d-", (b.s.)"r"(sc). (F-P-2)
7-31-13 Follow Up (b.s.) (s.c.) "Face - the - Music" & "Line to Cross" (FP2)

Smirking Gun[!]

OK, I won't overuse the term smoking gun, but when I heard Senator McCain's leak theory, I knew something was up.  "The only conceivable" reason that McCain knows the "motive for such damaging and compromising leaks" is that it is something he could conceive of doing.  The Issa cover-up committee is along the same track.  Worse than Watergate, less than WMD***.

September 11th occurred because the Bush administration had contempt for the Clinton administration and refused to carry on in the case against terrorism.  Fast and Furious is still under investigation, but it seems that the political case is of the opposite extreme.  The Obama administration not changing more from the previous administration.

I have a feeling that the Issa Committee investigation is actually an attempt to interfere with the Obama administration* of justice and foreign policy.  Or retribution for Watergate, Iran Contra and Plame combined, or Republican power** as usual.
 
* Ctrl F "obstructionism"
** now that is the ticket or subpoena(Thom Hartmann)

*** 6-22-12 Pre-Post-or-us?
(I was reticent to use 9/11, especially with the smoking[!] gun lede-in. While Representative Mica is really stretching things, two things are certain. September 11th or even a dead ATF agent are nothing to smirk about, and Representative Issa hides his smirk with a snear.)  
[Related posts:  Re:investigation, Re:dribble, Re-course, Re:turn(Ctrl F "sabotage" "pate")]
[GPS for MSNBC labels?]

[!] really sic, i.e. no typo, nor disrespect for the departed intended
[A caller to the Ed Schultz show noted a similar theme.  Republicans are more about obstruction politics than finding the facts.  They must have something to hide.  Obama's success and their incompetence.  But then there followed**2 on Thom Hartmann the PE/FDR/BS [!]]

[It is on !]
[A friend asked my opinion on the wikileaks deal. Well more specifically the personalities involved.  Bottomline, I don't feel that military personel should take it on themselve to leak top secret information without considering the consequences, nor should they have been distributed without the same considerations.  Unfortunately there may not be enough law on the books to prosecute the latter although there certainly is for the former.  Who do we have to blame for the laws on the books?  Congress.  Who do we have for not enough laws on the books?  Republicans.  Well, it is not the quantity but the quality.  But the answer is the same.  Talk is cheap, but actions*2 cost.]

*2 accidental link
[Weird link of the day.]
**2 with all due respect for B.S. it was the PE crack by FDR (Privileged Enterprise)
[Not so weird link of day.]
 

Reading List(UC)

Actually Read!
Proof of Heaven  4-20-13
...to be filled in...
Contact (sometime Fall '95)^^^
Not to book mark or end.[f1]^
(Nor to contrast "to read" or "having read".)

^rough footnote #1  (b.s. )twain+meet* (or list: swift + craft )
*(s c )^^
^^review scroll click legend/links
[f2] first link Not two reeds(b.s.) Theory, Left Behind, Punderous Ponderings
[f3] / "gadfly" ?

(4-22-13 ^^^ )PG? Post Graduate [Boston Strong]
(Not to F-Bomb)
PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION

4-24-13 The date may be telling. (pre-post or us? 4/21/13 1:15 PM)
Actually two reads, read & Posted 4/24/13 3:20PM
Ironically: we half two have too ? [!] [?] ...

AF Wack[!]

Buffalo has wings[!]
They Beet Green Bey!

[ ] = post-timing shun thing/c-labels
! scroll click iE.B.

i.e. bracketed/ post*/scheduled thing

 * (12-15-14)
12-13-14
Pre-Post or Us?  Hawks beat SC[!]

(No post on Saturday the 13th.)
(fp1)
Think Progress Down Under [?]

12-16-14 On 12-13-14, not to do the math or numerology, but there was more football.  The Midshipmen of Annapolis over the Black Knights of Westpoint 17-10 for Navy's 13th straight win.

FOOTNOTE PAGE TWO APRIL 2013

4-1-13: (b.s.) Fools - Pre-post-or-us? (sc), Swift Reading!(ow) (sc), Contempt for Courage, The Bully... (sc)

4-2-13 (b.s.)of sorts[!]?  Order actually read? The Treason of the Intellectuals, by Chris Hedges, Lessons From a Comeback, by Paul Krugman, Bush’s Economic Policies Bankrupted U.S., Reagan Budget Director Says, by Tracy Bloom on (David Stockman).

4-3-13 two too dimention? (b.s.) Fear and Running, It is about time...(sc), Dimentionalism(sic) (sc), Over Helming.(sc), Place Holder? (sc) (dimensionalism M-bed?)  Note.

$-$*-13: B4 I get too E-volved, I should note a few original intents, prior(a){i}^ two the heading I settled on. ^ o w [?]
[ Re: Too Evolved ? (b.s.): A, B. Fiddle Sticks^ , C, D. Primary Boogeyman, E. We Can't Wait, F. Following results. :/: ]

*cap or shift pun disKantinued
4-9-13 ** Re:Figure The resemblance to a stop sign is subtle but more symptomatic of a go sine.
4-15-13 From Bank to Bagel there is a lot to Un-M-bed.
4-16-13 "parsing": emphasis links
4-22-13: Careful what you S.F. (i.e. search 4? )
4-23-13 : darn may be closer.
"we+weave" /  A(sc), (b)...when first we practice..., C, (d)Oh, what a web..., E (Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor?), ]+[,  F, g, h, I(sc), J, K(sc), L(sc), M, N(sc)
"delta+dawn" / A(sc), B(sc), C(sc)
4-24-13 2nd line (sc)copy paste:  Pun it?, Game+Lock, Connecting the Dots, / , /, Filibuster Bluster*.
4-25-13 Not to bury the lede or G! (nor D, E, F?)
4-30-13 Pardon the Live chronism [!]

Leveling the World Stage?

And restoring some floors @ the U.N. 
Ultimately it is not about [No Bama O Drama.] (*) 
[David Gregory "he wants the debate".]

(*) NBOD coined 8-30-13 as QCON(re-links)
[Quick Comment on News, or might be QuipCON?]
[Foibles of punctuation and excuse m-beds.]
(Spoiler alert: Try Lemmings, Kidding Goats, and  Votes)

9-2-13 
Proposed resolution to congress.

9-3-13
Congress World Reaction(ABC)

It is not just about Obama's "Red Line", it is about the world having Red Lines or not.  It is truly about the use of WMD, as well as a nation that is falling apart (Syrian civil war) needing to have an urgency of the negotiating table. 

Alternatively or simultaneously, Syria's partners on the U.N. Security council as well as other opposition partners (Arab League, Pakistan, Iran,)should have a stake in getting things to the table or world court.

[Pre-Post-Or-US ?  The Leverage of NOW**?]

** anachronism of opinion (by Ghosh)
(*)segue[be-date?/timing]
[9-4-13 inserted NOW link]

9-27-13 M-bedded in the FP (freak n' pounding) i.e. capitol ization of font. Note situation of September's FP and their headings. And the 5th of sorts. / A. Inconvenient , B. , C. The Real B. S. of the F. C. , D. Nail Meet F--C---[!] , E. Irony versus Hypocrisy [!]

FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012

See Preface or Forward.
NOT TO MITT-FLOP: but I will process the footnotes scrolling down in time as opposed to September's format.


10-1-12 Preemptive Footnote:  PEG'd flag?  Pre-Post-or-us?

10-1-12 Simon says 2 point or...?  <= Crtl F "work in progress"
twitchy:
Politico: Mitt Romney: King of comedy
A.
g.  World Order is the Hardest Work. (GO TO Ctrl F above and there)
Z.

10-2-12 Simon says 2 point or...?   [update: "Thanks to my Bane or Tan Gents...]
(links bubbl'in up)
the tale: Off the Cuff
Keys:  (b.s. font, Charts )
the C: (b.s. nail, see "the tale")
Hoods: The %th EleFont
pinning: (b.s. bill yards) Rhetorical Been Laden[*] In-Chief
chicken-hawks: (b.s. egg head) Contempt for Courage
[after math: Andrea Mitchell?]

Initialism

Not to pun on Recreationism [!]

But Crypto Political Science deals with a more dimentional political spectrum of global exceptionionalism.  (FP1)

(not there yet)
In the begining...
Long Story

BLANK NETWORK (scroll click){Paper U?}
{Re insert} Speaking of Pre Post or Us ... Knowwww!!!!*

* Colbert Daft Anachronism
(MSNBC search for "Failed States" flailed bridges)

{OK, the original sentiment is that there is politics of a third kind^.  Not just the libertarian(6) , but international perspectives (14) that clash with the old partisan ships. The glint of tinfoil(17) is actually a tool in the shed of progress that cannot be emptied by executive order**.  There is a war on terrorism, it was declared by congress, and the president is the commander-in-chief.  It is tough enough dealing (f.c.)^^ with adversarial states, let alone protect America from it's legacy(such as it is)*** in a world that is changing, from the global to the local.  Crypto Political Science as I have coined it relates, to the wise crack of perception being reality.  Knot[!] to mention, truth being the first casualty in war.  It his hard enough dealing with a divided congress, let alone pre-constitutional or crypto-political organizations.}

** Ctrl F/papa
*** history in general/leading in particular(b.s.)
[OBAMA AM/Tonight Show: Changing the box ... of Tetra Heed Run.]

^ Embassy closings cover for actions or prudence in the unfolding middle-c of Turkey and Yemen?  [To The Point ?]
(The Point *link* is yet to be inserted: an NPR report on Terrorism.  A tangent? Who would be the counter-balance to Alan Simpson?  But where is Joe Scarborough? LET ALONE THE CYCLE.) 

[8-9-13 P.S.] ^^(f.c.)4ment change see (6)th link "dimentional". Let alone the Point !

Pre-Capitalization

(Kant in you'ld)[See DATE/Time Stamp]***
RE-CAPitalization*
i.e. preemptive heading for Week In Review
In recognition it was only Friday, I am not sure what date or if I will continue the new 4mat.
Returning to Weak in Review RE: The Cycle**

***(bold and stamp/emphasis)
[PRE-POST-OR-US 1-4-13]

Reminder as well... e-N-f branching or F-N-L ?
(Daily KOS / acronomiter)

* O U C H ?
**new N/FRY(neither fully read yet)

Hold your head up Paul Krugman!

Reform Is Needed. Reform Is in the Air. We Can't Afford to Fail.Truthout.org by: Joseph Stiglitz | Visit article original @ The Guardian UK

Geithner's Plan Will Tax Main Street to Make Wall Street Richer by Dean Baker Truthout.org or Huffington Post

Paul Krugman rounds out or triangles out the table. I will only make one comment in that the bottom line is the people, and since the trickle down has caused an economic bubble if not civilization to go up in smoke and mirrors, that the burden is there on that bottom line, while the money is in the clouds. OK, now I'm rolling. But seriously, I am not sure if we are caught between salting the clouds and salting a mine, but Humpty Dumpty * needs help. Are these the Three Musketeers?
[*] Pre-Post-or-us? links embedded: A Plea to Congress ! Between the charges ? "Off a Cliff" And do we have d'Artagnan on The Fence?

★Re-initialism★

Major Fail or ... Hume or ? ... *

* Too Random...

(Pre-post-or-us ?)
{Note # labels.  Not to frac' or fudge.}

The point is that I finally read this piece(see bold Hume) which is very Hegelian.
~~~
I have also yet to insert ma hat pa mamby. ~~~ **
~~~

[  MF'4  ]  4-30-14

[5-1-14 Incidentalism?  Who started it {?}]
~~~ Sandel/Huntington Revisited ~~~
** photos still on tablet

A Wonderful Conversation!

You take the high road,
and I'll take the low road.
We take the pre-road,
and now for the post-road.

And we'll all be in blank
before we can say...

Who, What, When, Where and Why,
by How. (3-20)

OK... enough Rant or Ramble.

The real story is that considering the past debates, ABC's was nothing new, except that it was broadcast on the airwaves, not just on cable.

So... I will conclude that it was a success,
given d'meaning of the medium.

Obama took the high road, and shone as best he could on the road, while Hillary took the old road, and may be shone the road.

Now for footnotes, on what got me on this road, of which I have only read from the search engines not the pieces.
Clinton-Obama Debate: ABC Hit on Focus on Minor Issues -
The ABC Debate: A Shameful Night for the U.S. Media -
Debate: ABC Decides Top Issues Facing Americans Are Flag Pins and '60s Radicals

HERE IS A BIG HINT: You don't have to read all three. In fact if you just read the headings you have a bigger hint.
Thanks to Thom Hartmann, and Editor and Publisher, and again for me these are (nfry): not fully read yet

[speaking of pre-posts and the media shone up: or is it pre-post-er-o-us? or is it just...]

Pre-post-or-us?

Humpty Dumpty was an Egg
The Economy was a bubble.

Now the economy is a wall,
and we all must take the fall.

For the wall * and/or the omelet
is a little egg on our face.

William Greider will be the guest of Bill Moyers regarding Humpty Dumpty. [**]

* the preposterous nature is the point that I had flip-flopped the allegory (from egg to wall) (Inflation/deflation seem unavoidable realities without real change and a little egg on the wall.)
[Update 3-31-09: bottom link changed to include extra post]

[** 6-22-09: I finally inserted the link to the Greider/Moyers piece @ Humpty Dumpty(above) and have yet to listen but the metaphor has been used here as well.]